Abstract: Our review of the literature revealed that two types of health status measures, which we classify as direct and indirect, appear to meet the criteria stated above. Whereas health status is measured in terms of the respondents' functional capacity, illness level, or perceived level of health in the direct measures, health status is inferred from the level of use of health service or expenditures for care in the indirect measures. This article is based on indirect measures, e.g. Availability of government provided health services in per lakh population. Like District Hospitals, Civil Hospitals, Community Health Centres (CHCs), Primary Health Centres (PHCs), Number of working Doctors & Nurses, Number of Doctors & Nurses in per lakh population, Number of Health Centres & beds in per lakh population and Life Expectancy Rate. This article contained comparative analysis of health status among 16 districts of Chhattisgarh state using of availability of district wise health facility indicators. Without good health convenience we cannot get better health status of any country, State or any particular area. The health status of Kanker district is best and Durg district is most poor among the 16 districts of Chhattisgarh state in health facilities. But in district wise life expectancy rate, Durg district rate is better than other districts.
Keywords: Health status of Chhattisgarh state, District wise health status of Chhattisgarh, PHCs, CHCs, Life expectancy of Chhattisgarh state.
Title: District Wise Comparative Analysis of Health Facilities in Chhattisgarh State
Author: Firoj Kumar Sonwani
International Journal of Healthcare Sciences
ISSN 2348-5728 (Online)
Research Publish Journals
