Overview of Endovascular and Open Surgical Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Repair

Abstract: The main objective of conducting this review was to obtain difference in between two important procedures in treatment of AAA and evaluate the procedures EVAR and OSR in different aspect such as mortality rate and suitability of patients and complication that follows each procedure. we conducted a systematic review of all published triales throughdifferent database such MEDLINE (pubmed) and EMBASE. The following search terms strategies were used on each database:‘Aortic aneurysm, abdominal and open procedure and endovascular’. search was sequentially performed using the following keywords and phrases: “open” vs. “endovascular aneurysm repair”. AAA are connected with significant morbidity, death and health-care expenses. Patients with AAA <5.5 cm have a yearly threat of rupture of around 1 percent. For AAA <5.5 cm in size top quality RCT outcomes show that active monitoring with ultrasound and postponed OSR (if AAA obtains a size of ≥ 5.5 cm or the patient establishes aneurysm associated signs) leads to similar long-lasting survival and lifestyle, less OSR, and lower expenses than instant OSR no matter age or gender. Many formerly released research studies of OSRs of AAA done by cosmetic surgeons and healthcare facilities recommend that there is an inverted relationship in between volume and short-term death. Keywords: EVAR and OSR, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Title: Overview of Endovascular and Open Surgical Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Repair Author: Abdullah Hamed Algethami, Turki Sulaiman Alghuraybi, Hussam Abdulrazaq Alnemari, Abdulateef Ibrahim Alsulaimany, Mohammed Sameer Aljehani, Meshari Abed Algethami International Journal of Healthcare Sciences ISSN 2348-5728 (Online) Research Publish Journals

Citation