Abstract: The time pressing of construction is one of the obstacles often faced by professionals in the construction field. As a result, many companies are making efforts to speed up the cycle time of the project so that the distribution process can be shortened. Therefore, the selection of appropriate construction methods used with the aim of meeting the needs of the achievement of an effective and efficient time. The research methodology is done by identifying the methods of work through observation of the implementation work installation then determine the work task, duration, and resource requirements at their respective jobs. After getting the required data simulated with the operating system WebCyclone through coding results that have been made. In this study used a simulation by the WebCyclone to know the value of productivity, duration and cost of construction operations. From both methods, the result of analysis by the conventional method of installation productivity of 0,276 units/hour or 2,208 units/day with total time required for 100 units is 46 days at a cost IDR 1.957.361.309,- while the Hollow Core Floor Panel (HCFP) method is 0,354 units / hour or 2,832 units / day with the total time required for 100 units is 36 days at a cost of IDR 2.103.968.736,-. Of the two alternatives compared to the most efficient methods of the time is a method of Hollow Core Floor Panel (HCFP). In terms of cost, Hollow Core Floor Panel (HCFP) method is more expensive than the conventional method, but when compared to the overall duration of the completion of the project, the time taken by conventional methods costs that tend to be more expensive.
Keywords: Productivity, Floor, HCFP, Time, Cost, WebCyclone.
Title: Work Productivity Analysis of Conventional Floor Structure and Hollow Core Floor Panel (HCFP)
Author: Rachel Chrisanti, Mawardi Amin
International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research
ISSN 2348-7607 (Online)
Research Publish Journals
